Get your story straight—employer’s change in explanation can be evidence of pretext
Posted on July 10, 2015
Posted in Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA)
Yet again, an employer is burned by asserting inconsistent reasons for the termination of an employee. In a recent case, the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals found that an employee had presented sufficient evidence of an unlawful termination based on his use of FMLA leave where the employer offered differing stories as to the reason […]
READ MORE
Transgender former police officer states a claim under Title VII-but fails to show sufficient evidence of discrimination
Posted on June 18, 2015
Posted in Sex Discrimination, Title VII
Last week, the district court ruled that although discrimination based on transgender status was a cognizable claim under Title VII, the plaintiff had failed to demonstrate that the rejection of her application to be part of a volunteer mounted patrol was discriminatory. Finkle v. Howard County, Maryland, Case No. SAG-13-3236 (D. Md. June 12, 2015).
READ MORE
Shifting explanations result in employer liability in Title VII retaliation claim
Posted on June 12, 2015
Posted in Retaliation, Title VII
So a supervisor offers a couple of different explanations for action taken against an employee—how much does that matter? Maybe quite a bit, according to an opinion issued by Judge Jackson last week. See Mohammed v. Central Driving Mini Storage, Inc., Case No. 2:13cv00469 (E.D. Va. 2015). In this case, the court awarded a former […]
READ MORE
What if an employer fails to abide by its own disciplinary process—what’s the harm?
Posted on April 10, 2015
According to a decision from the First Circuit Court of Appeals earlier this year, an employer’s failure to take action in accordance with its own disciplinary process could support a finding of discrimination. Soto-Feliciano v. Villa Cofresi Hotels, Inc., No. 13-2296 (February 20, 2015). Specifically, this failure can support a finding that an employer’s alleged […]
READ MORE
No FMLA Retaliation Where Employer Can Show Employee Terminated for Improperly Accessing Supervisor’s Email
Posted on October 10, 2014
Posted in Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA)
The decision of the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia in the case of Downs v. Winchester Medical Center, et al., No. 5:13cv00083 regarding what constitutes a claim for interference in violation of the FMLA was the topic of a posting from a few months ago. The district court had found […]
READ MORE
No USERRA Claim Where Vet Terminated Based on Threats Made Against Co-workers
Posted on September 26, 2014
Posted in Other
In a recent decision, a judge in the Eastern District of Virginia dismissed the claims asserted by a United States Army veteran with PTSD that his employer had terminated him in violation of both the Uniformed Services Employment and Reemplyoment Rights Act (“USERRA”) and the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”). Williamson v. Bon Secours Richmond […]
READ MORE
Threat to Discipline Based on False Report to EEOC Could Support Retaliation Claim
Posted on August 22, 2014
Posted in Retaliation, Title VII
In Cox v. Onondaga County Sheriff Department, No. 12-1526 (2d Cir. July 23, 2014), the Second Circuit recently held that threats made by an employer to charge employees with making a false report to the EEOC could establish a prima facie case of unlawful retaliation in violation of Title VII, shifting the burden of proof […]
READ MORE
Eleventh Circuit Reverses Summary Judgment Ruling in Discrimination Case—Reminding District Court that in Status-based Discrimination Claims, But-for Causation Not Required
Posted on May 30, 2014
Posted in Discrimination Law, National Origin Discrimination
This week, the Eleventh Circuit issued a ruling in Barthelus v. G4S Government Solutions, Inc., No. 13-14121 (May 27, 2014), reversing the district court’s award of summary judgment to an employer and finding that there was a material issue of fact regarding whether the employers’ grounds for termination were merely pretext. In so ruling, the […]
READ MORE
It Isn’t All About the Ultimate Decisionmaker—Fourth Circuit Vacates Summary Judgment in Favor of Employer in ADEA Case
Posted on January 8, 2014
As employers, we often focus on what knowledge was in the hands of the ultimate decisionmaker at the time a crucial employment decision is made. However, as the Fourth Circuit reminds us in its decision in Harris v. Powhatan County School Board, No. 12-2091, the knowledge and intent of those who have the power and […]
READ MORE